National Gay Marriage Ban Rejected

Politics with a Liberal Bias


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2007 June
2007 May
2007 January
2006 December
2006 November
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June

My Links
Candidates on the Issues
Young Democrats of America
MoveOn.org
Alan Colmes
DNC.org
Air America
The New York Times
Reuters
9/11 Conspiracy Theory

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



US Deaths in Iraq since March 20th, 2003


Free JavaScripts provided
by The JavaScript Source

Proud D

Democrat History


National Gay Marriage Ban Rejected
07.20.06 (7:40 am)   [edit]

The House on Tuesday rejected a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, ending for another year a congressional debate that supporters of the ban hope will still reverberate in this fall's election.  The 236-187 vote for the proposal to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman was 47 votes short of the two-thirds majority needed to advance a constitutional amendment. It followed six weeks after the Senate also decisively defeated the amendment.

I can't say this is a win for the Democrats, because the Republicans keep doing this for a political edge.  Even though it got voted down in both houses of Congress, it still doesn't mean it will stop being an issue.  Republicans use this as a ploy to get conservative voters to the polls.  They really don't care about the definition of marriage, they only care if more conservatives get elected.

I personally am not against a gay marriage ban.  I feel that gays should have the right to marry because homosexuality is not a choice, it is just the way you are.  Allowing them to marry harms me in no physical way what so ever.  It does not violate a "traditional" marriage because of the fact that ones marriage is unique to that couple only.  Besides, what gives me the right to tell two people who loves one another completely that they do not have the right to unite as one.  In the church's eye, it is morally wrong but that should be between them and God, not our government.  For a Republican party whose principles are not to meddle in people's personal lives, sure are doing an awful lot to get involed where they have no business being.

 


posted by: JT (reply)
post date: 07.20.06 (4:04 am)

I couldn't agree with you more.... what do people care what consenting adults do together, if they're not hurting anyone else? I don't see how gay people marrying threatens my own "conventional" marriage. I have friends whose partnerships are more mature than most of my straight friends' marriages.



posted by: inkspector (reply)
post date: 07.20.06 (5:10 am)

As long as people are happy, that is what is important.
I do think there are issues about this that do have a social ramification (sp)which many businesses would have to address as well as courts. Ex: insurance, gay divorce, health care, social security (benefits), and entitled retirement benefits for survivors, just to name a few. It always comes down to the cost (money) doesn't it?



posted by: taralynn (reply)
post date: 07.20.06 (7:23 am)

What offends me the most is the right's continued use of religion to create laws. What happened to the words of wisdom of our forefathers?

Thomas Jefferson: "wall of separation between church and state"
James Madison: "Strongly guarded . . . is the separation between religion and government in the Constitution of the United States"
Ulysses S. Grant: also called for Americans to "Keep the church and state forever separate."

All politicians and persons arguing that a "marriage" is between man and woman derive their reasons from their religious beliefs and usually cite Biblical text. If this is not an encroachment on my first Amendment rights, I do not know what is.

Here is another scary thought...all those countries which are the "axis" of evil or support terrorist, are mostly theocracies...hmm, anyone seeing a pattern here, is this what our country is leading too?



posted by: Chuba (reply)
post date: 07.31.06 (6:49 am)

Gay people are the best. They are more fun to hang around with than most straight people. So why is the g'ment bothering them?? To take the attention off the real problems of the world and so the g'ment will feel better about some majority of people finally standing behind them because that majority is a group of homophobic assholes.

Your Name:


Your Comment:


Liberal Center

Democratic National Committee



Political Party Beliefs
Democratic Party
Republican Party
Green Party
Libertarian Party


Know Your Candidates
Joseph Biden (D)
Hillary R Clinton (D)
John Edwards (D)
Russell Feingold (D)
Bill Frist (R)
Newt Gingrich (R)
Rudy Giuliani (R)
Al Gore (D)
Lindsey Graham (R)
Ted Kennedy (D)
John Kerry (D)
John McCain (R)
Barack Obama (D)


Political Podcasts
DNC Podcast
Left, Right & Center
Face The Nation
CNN Podcast
NY Times Podcast
NPR: It's All Politics
Baton Rouge News Podcasts


DNC

Blue Donkey

Vote Democrat

The Donkey Wins!

The New York Times

Louisiana State University