WTC Conspiracy Theory Puts Professor on Leave

Politics with a Liberal Bias


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2007 June
2007 May
2007 January
2006 December
2006 November
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June

My Links
Candidates on the Issues
Young Democrats of America
MoveOn.org
Alan Colmes
DNC.org
Air America
The New York Times
Reuters
9/11 Conspiracy Theory

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



US Deaths in Iraq since March 20th, 2003


Free JavaScripts provided
by The JavaScript Source

Proud D

Democrat History


WTC Conspiracy Theory Puts Professor on Leave
09.11.06 (8:15 am)   [edit]

As you well know, today commemorates the fifth anniversary of 9/11.  Even though its been five years this still hasn't put the conspiracy theorist to rest.  A professor at Brigham Young University is on paid leave for suggesting the government is responsible for the destruction of the World Trade Center.  The man on paid leave is Dr. Steven Jones.  He's a physics professor involved in the so-called "9-11 Truth Movement." Jones believes unnamed government agencies orchestrated the fall of the twin towers, and he says there's evidence to back it up.  Two weeks ago he published his theory in a paper called "Why Indeed did the World Trade Center Buildings Collapse?"  In it, the professor says the towers fell not because of planes hitting them but rather pre-positioned demolition charges.  He cites research conducted at BYU on materials from ground zero, asserting those materials show evidence of thermite, a compound used in military detonations.  He says terrorists could have never set those charges.

Dr. Jones began his career at the university in 1985 and has been known for his cold fusion research. Other professors will teach his classes while he's on paid leave. He will be allowed to conduct research in his field, but the university is reviewing his actions.

This man just like anyone of us is entitled to his own opinions.  Under our Constitution he has that right granted to him by the First Amendment and cannot be taken away from him.  He should not be silenced nor should he be removed from his professorship at the university.  His views on the World Trade Center bombing is a little more radical than mine, but he should not be reprimanded for his personal opinion on the matter.

The 9-11 conspiracy theory has been a rather hot topic among the blogosphere in the past few years.  The word is really starting to get around that perhaps the twin towers didn't fall because of a plane crash.  Many people are theorizing that outside help was used to take these towers down.  If you are interested in learning more about this September 11th conspiracy theory, please visit my blog post entitled "9/11 Conspiracy Video".  On it shows a video proving that the towers were taken down by controlled explosions, and later I give my opinion of the whole conspiracy video.  This is really something to see and should be viewed by everyone.

 


posted by: tfruge1 (reply)
post date: 09.11.06 (11:47 am)

Reply to: truthserum41
You make a very valid point here. I couldn't agree with you more. Calling them names is not a form of debate. People should not be silenced just because their opinion doesn't match what is mainstream.

Your Name:


Your Comment:


Liberal Center

Democratic National Committee



Political Party Beliefs
Democratic Party
Republican Party
Green Party
Libertarian Party


Know Your Candidates
Joseph Biden (D)
Hillary R Clinton (D)
John Edwards (D)
Russell Feingold (D)
Bill Frist (R)
Newt Gingrich (R)
Rudy Giuliani (R)
Al Gore (D)
Lindsey Graham (R)
Ted Kennedy (D)
John Kerry (D)
John McCain (R)
Barack Obama (D)


Political Podcasts
DNC Podcast
Left, Right & Center
Face The Nation
CNN Podcast
NY Times Podcast
NPR: It's All Politics
Baton Rouge News Podcasts


DNC

Blue Donkey

Vote Democrat

The Donkey Wins!

The New York Times

Louisiana State University