HPV Vaccine to be Mandated for 6th Graders

Politics with a Liberal Bias


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2007 June
2007 May
2007 January
2006 December
2006 November
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June

My Links
Candidates on the Issues
Young Democrats of America
MoveOn.org
Alan Colmes
DNC.org
Air America
The New York Times
Reuters
9/11 Conspiracy Theory

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



US Deaths in Iraq since March 20th, 2003


Free JavaScripts provided
by The JavaScript Source

Proud D

Democrat History


HPV Vaccine to be Mandated for 6th Graders
09.15.06 (7:35 am)   [edit]

Girls entering the sixth grade in a Michigan public school next year would have to be vaccinated against cervical cancer under legislation backed by a bipartisan group of lawmakers.  The vaccine was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in June for use in girls and women and has been hailed as a breakthrough in cancer prevention.  It prevents infections from some strains of the sexually transmitted human papilloma virus (HPV), which can cause cervical cancer and genital warts.  A government advisory panel said that ideally, the vaccine should be given before girls become sexually active preferably before age 15.  The American Cancer Society estimates that cervical cancer will be diagnosed in 9,700 women nationwide, and that 3,700 will die.  Studies show that the vaccine can prevent from two types of HPV that are responsible for about 70 percent of all cervical cancers. 

This decision is causing quite a stir that is being turned into a political issue.  Religiously motivated Conservatives are viewing the mandate of this vaccine as a free pass for all sexually active teenagers to have unprotected sex without the risk of catching HPV and contracting cervical cancer.  Liberals like myself are all for this mandate on the grounds that it will prevent cervical cancer and the virus HPV.

I was listening to this debate on a local AM radio station this morning which sparked me to do a little bit of research so I can accurately write this post.  According to independent studies, 80 percent of all sexually active women will be infected by HPV by age 50.  In my opinion, anything we can do to stop the spread of this very dangerous virus needs to be orchestrated.  What better way to do this than by making it mandatory to enter public school.  I personally don't see where the opposers to this have a valid argument.  The children of these opposers will only thank them in the future for having them receive this potentially life-saving drug.

 


posted by: Chuba (reply)
post date: 09.15.06 (6:09 am)

Personally, I completely agree w/ this vaccination. People just don't understand ALL the complications that come from having HPV. To get rid of the bad cells this virus causes, which ultimately lead to cancer, is an unfortunate process. There is a certain procedure that is administered, that if it is done too many times due to dangerous cells coming back, can lead to miscarriages. What this procedure does, it electrically scrapes off a layer off of your cervics to completely get rid of cancerous cells, if there are enough layers scrapped off, the cervics can miscarriage a baby a lot easier than normal. So back to my point, I am all for this vaccine. If I ever have a daughter, I will definitely make sure she is given this vaccine.



posted by: Cutter (reply)
post date: 09.15.06 (6:12 am)

There are so many things wrong with this that I can't even begin to speak about it.



posted by: tfruge1 (reply)
post date: 09.15.06 (10:16 am)

Reply to: Cutter
What do you find wrong with it cutter? It prevents cervical cancer and the STD known as HPV. Why not mandate it to decrease the spread of this disease.



posted by: inkspector (reply)
post date: 09.20.06 (3:58 pm)

I was watching a talk show that was discussing this vaccine.
It seems as though the panel was saying that it should not just be the girls who get vaccinated but boys too as they carry this around with them. The vaccine has not been proven effective yet which makes one think, are these people guinea pigs?

The major type of cervical cancer that they talk about on the TV commercials is a virus and if caught early enough, can be cured with the proper treatment. This seems to be prevelant with teens and those under 30 who are sexually active with mulitple partners.

Then there is the tumor kind of cervical cancer which is the kind my Mom had. This type is harder to cure and treatment is much more aggressive. (My Mom was cured but less than a year after her cure, died of radiation complications.)

Again, a vaccine for a cure for the virus type for girls only, will not solve the problem if the guy has multiple partners and lies to just one girl or a few. Also, this comes down to the money involved, drug companies profits, and will insurance pay for it and who can actually afford it?



posted by: tfruge1 (reply)
post date: 09.20.06 (4:04 pm)

Reply to: inkspector
You bring up a very good point with the financial reasoning. The state made it manditary so that means every girl must have it. The question is, who is going to pay for it?

Sorry about your mom. I know this doesn't help her situation but I hope one day they will be able to find a cure for all this.



posted by: inkspector (reply)
post date: 09.20.06 (4:50 pm)

Reply to: tfruge1
I do not think this vaccination would help if the person had the tumor type cancer vs the virus type.
So what sense would that make? Could lawsuits against the state follow if the vaccine did not work for some but they came down with the cancer?






posted by: tfruge1 (reply)
post date: 09.20.06 (6:02 pm)

Reply to: inkspector
From what I read, it supposed to in fact prevent cervical cancer due to the HPV virus. This vaccine will not prevent ovarian cancer or other forms of cancer from what I understand.

Hopefully it will act just like the mumps or measils vaccine where a person gets the vaccine and actually never gets the disease.



posted by: inkspector (reply)
post date: 09.21.06 (6:27 am)

Reply to: tfruge1
Right, it would prevent a virus type of cancer.
It would actually have no effect on a tumor type of cancer since that is not a virus related cancer.

So, what I am saying, if all qualifying people were forced by their state to take this preventative virus vaccine and it helped the majority of them, BUT a few people ended up with a tumor type which is not a virus related type of cancer, where would that leave the state if some people with the tumor type decided to sue?

I can see the state thinking it is a preventative measure for public health issues but guys would have to have a vaccine also in order for it to really work 100%.




posted by: tfruge1 (reply)
post date: 09.21.06 (9:22 am)

Reply to: inkspector
I totally agree with you. HPV will not have any affects on males. It will only allow them to carry the disease and pass it on to other females. Like you said, if they want to rid the world of this virus for the future, they need to administer this vaccine to males as well.

Your Name:


Your Comment:


Liberal Center

Democratic National Committee



Political Party Beliefs
Democratic Party
Republican Party
Green Party
Libertarian Party


Know Your Candidates
Joseph Biden (D)
Hillary R Clinton (D)
John Edwards (D)
Russell Feingold (D)
Bill Frist (R)
Newt Gingrich (R)
Rudy Giuliani (R)
Al Gore (D)
Lindsey Graham (R)
Ted Kennedy (D)
John Kerry (D)
John McCain (R)
Barack Obama (D)


Political Podcasts
DNC Podcast
Left, Right & Center
Face The Nation
CNN Podcast
NY Times Podcast
NPR: It's All Politics
Baton Rouge News Podcasts


DNC

Blue Donkey

Vote Democrat

The Donkey Wins!

The New York Times

Louisiana State University