|
HPV Vaccine to be Mandated for 6th Graders
Politics with a Liberal Bias |
![]() Blog For Free! Archives Home 2007 June 2007 May 2007 January 2006 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June My Links Candidates on the Issues Young Democrats of America MoveOn.org Alan Colmes DNC.org Air America The New York Times Reuters 9/11 Conspiracy Theory tBlog My Profile Send tMail My tFriends My Images Sponsored Blog by The JavaScript Source
|
posted by: Chuba (reply) post date: 09.15.06 (6:09 am) Personally, I completely agree w/ this vaccination. People just don't understand ALL the complications that come from having HPV. To get rid of the bad cells this virus causes, which ultimately lead to cancer, is an unfortunate process. There is a certain procedure that is administered, that if it is done too many times due to dangerous cells coming back, can lead to miscarriages. What this procedure does, it electrically scrapes off a layer off of your cervics to completely get rid of cancerous cells, if there are enough layers scrapped off, the cervics can miscarriage a baby a lot easier than normal. So back to my point, I am all for this vaccine. If I ever have a daughter, I will definitely make sure she is given this vaccine. posted by: Cutter (reply) post date: 09.15.06 (6:12 am) There are so many things wrong with this that I can't even begin to speak about it. posted by: tfruge1 (reply) post date: 09.15.06 (10:16 am) Reply to: Cutter What do you find wrong with it cutter? It prevents cervical cancer and the STD known as HPV. Why not mandate it to decrease the spread of this disease. posted by: inkspector (reply) post date: 09.20.06 (3:58 pm) I was watching a talk show that was discussing this vaccine. It seems as though the panel was saying that it should not just be the girls who get vaccinated but boys too as they carry this around with them. The vaccine has not been proven effective yet which makes one think, are these people guinea pigs? The major type of cervical cancer that they talk about on the TV commercials is a virus and if caught early enough, can be cured with the proper treatment. This seems to be prevelant with teens and those under 30 who are sexually active with mulitple partners. Then there is the tumor kind of cervical cancer which is the kind my Mom had. This type is harder to cure and treatment is much more aggressive. (My Mom was cured but less than a year after her cure, died of radiation complications.) Again, a vaccine for a cure for the virus type for girls only, will not solve the problem if the guy has multiple partners and lies to just one girl or a few. Also, this comes down to the money involved, drug companies profits, and will insurance pay for it and who can actually afford it? posted by: tfruge1 (reply) post date: 09.20.06 (4:04 pm) Reply to: inkspector You bring up a very good point with the financial reasoning. The state made it manditary so that means every girl must have it. The question is, who is going to pay for it? Sorry about your mom. I know this doesn't help her situation but I hope one day they will be able to find a cure for all this. posted by: inkspector (reply) post date: 09.20.06 (4:50 pm) Reply to: tfruge1 I do not think this vaccination would help if the person had the tumor type cancer vs the virus type. So what sense would that make? Could lawsuits against the state follow if the vaccine did not work for some but they came down with the cancer? posted by: tfruge1 (reply) post date: 09.20.06 (6:02 pm) Reply to: inkspector From what I read, it supposed to in fact prevent cervical cancer due to the HPV virus. This vaccine will not prevent ovarian cancer or other forms of cancer from what I understand. Hopefully it will act just like the mumps or measils vaccine where a person gets the vaccine and actually never gets the disease. posted by: inkspector (reply) post date: 09.21.06 (6:27 am) Reply to: tfruge1 Right, it would prevent a virus type of cancer. It would actually have no effect on a tumor type of cancer since that is not a virus related cancer. So, what I am saying, if all qualifying people were forced by their state to take this preventative virus vaccine and it helped the majority of them, BUT a few people ended up with a tumor type which is not a virus related type of cancer, where would that leave the state if some people with the tumor type decided to sue? I can see the state thinking it is a preventative measure for public health issues but guys would have to have a vaccine also in order for it to really work 100%. posted by: tfruge1 (reply) post date: 09.21.06 (9:22 am) Reply to: inkspector I totally agree with you. HPV will not have any affects on males. It will only allow them to carry the disease and pass it on to other females. Like you said, if they want to rid the world of this virus for the future, they need to administer this vaccine to males as well. |
Political Party Beliefs Know Your Candidates Political Podcasts
|