|
Ahmadinejad Speaks To the U.N.
Politics with a Liberal Bias |
![]() Blog For Free! Archives Home 2007 June 2007 May 2007 January 2006 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June My Links Candidates on the Issues Young Democrats of America MoveOn.org Alan Colmes DNC.org Air America The New York Times Reuters 9/11 Conspiracy Theory tBlog My Profile Send tMail My tFriends My Images Sponsored Blog by The JavaScript Source
|
posted by: quickwit (reply) post date: 09.20.06 (8:13 am) You're an incompetent idiot. The Nuclear program was started before the Iranian Revoultion you moron. We were a little more friendly with the ruler of Iran then, than we are now. You assert the fact that we have no evidence of weapons making. We also had no evidence of Mr.Hitler's concentration camps either. Boy, I bet those jews wished we would have found some evidence so we could have helped them out.(That was just a side note.) We don't have any evidence because he won't allow the inspectors in to monitor for illegal activity. Man you are right when you say we should just talk with them, because as I remember Mr. Chamberlin was pretty successful keeping Britain out of WWII with his diplomacy. You are even more right when you say we should just take out only what is necessary for making bombs, so then the Iranians can use those sites for their peaceful communes or better yet they can rebuild their nuclear capabilities, while the islamofacists are still in power. Dear Mr blogger, plz pray to allah and ask for my forgiveness next time you are at the mosque. But plz dont conquer by the sword. posted by: tfruge1 (reply) post date: 09.20.06 (8:50 am) Reply to: quickwit First of all there quickwit, I was right to say that their nuclear program started in the 1950s. The Iranian Revolution occured in 1979 so before you start name calling how about you get the facts straight. Secondly, just because diplomacy didn't work with Chamberlin doesn't mean it won't work with Ahmadinejad. The way it looks, he wants to talk. Just recently he talked in front of the entire UN General Assembly. To me that is a sign that he wants open communication unlike what happened in Chamberlin's days. Thirdly, if we attack their facilities this will greatly dampen their nuclear program. Contrary to your ideas, it doesn't just take a few days or months to build a nuclear facility. This is very long process that Iran is still trying to do. So I say yes, if we take out their facilities, this will greatly weaken their ability to produce anything nuclear for quite some time. After we do then we can sanction them so they cannot receive anymore uranium to enrich. It is very quite simple really. On a side note, before you come and start making comments on my blog, atleast take the time to formulate a complete thought and get your facts straight. I know this is hard for you to do, but try not to be like your role model President Bush and lets start by telling the facts like they are. posted by: PastorDave (reply) post date: 09.20.06 (11:12 am) I will comment on your post later, when there is adequate time to give at least a semi-thoughtful paragraph or two. On your LSU scoreboard, I advise that you go ahead and mark the Nov. 11 contest with a "Loss". It will surely happen. posted by: tfruge1 (reply) post date: 09.20.06 (3:06 pm) Reply to: PastorDave Quite funny there PastorDave. There is no way we are going to lose to Bama. Wishful thinking on your part though. I will be looking to hear a comment when you have time. They are always welcome. posted by: quickwit (reply) post date: 09.21.06 (10:23 am) My facts were straight, however seeing that you can't remember the previous sentence and link it to the next, I am right in calling you a moron. You argument of the Iranian revolution is based solely on the fact that you don't pay attention. If I take the time out of my day to throughly read your post, then I beg you plz shut up and finish reading my comment. Unlike your stupid beliefs of just taking out their nuclear sights, we should replace the totalitarian regime that is over there with a regime that does not seek to conquer by the sword. Coming to the UN means absolutely nothing. If they really wanted talks they halt their enrichment process. They would not try to Pearl Harbor us like the japanese did before WWII. Thanks for your time if you read the whole thing. If not you can take your blog and stick it where there is plenty of room.(between your ears) |
Political Party Beliefs Know Your Candidates Political Podcasts
|